Re: Postgres not using array
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres not using array |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23465.1219328880@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres not using array (André Volpato<andre.volpato@ecomtecnologia.com.br>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres not using array
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Volpato?= <andre.volpato@ecomtecnologia.com.br> writes: > Explain output: > HashAggregate (cost=19826.23..19826.96 rows=73 width=160) (actual > time=11826.754..11826.754 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Subquery Scan b2 (cost=19167.71..19817.21 rows=722 width=160) > (actual time=11826.752..11826.752 rows=0 loops=1) > Filter: (bds_internacoes(200805, 200806, (b2.cod)::text, > 'qtdI'::text, 'P'::bpchar) >= 1::numeric) > -> Limit (cost=19167.71..19248.89 rows=2165 width=48) (actual > time=415.157..621.043 rows=28923 loops=1) So I guess the question is "what is the bds_internacoes function, and why is it so slow?" regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: