Re: O_DIRECT on macOS
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: O_DIRECT on macOS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 234364.1626704007@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: O_DIRECT on macOS (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: O_DIRECT on macOS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:42 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> prairiedog thinks that Assert is too optimistic about whether all >> those flags exist. > Fixed. Hmm ... we used to have to avoid putting #if constructs in the arguments of macros (such as StaticAssertStmt). Maybe that's not a thing anymore with C99, and in any case this whole stanza is fairly platform-specific so we may not run into a compiler that complains. But my hindbrain wants to see this done with separate statements, eg #if defined(O_CLOEXEC) StaticAssertStmt((PG_O_DIRECT & O_CLOEXEC) == 0, "PG_O_DIRECT collides with O_CLOEXEC"); #endif regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: