Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23436.1017933096@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > PUBLIC can be made less reserved easily. See patch below. Well, we could do that, but this patch seems an ugly way to do it; we have too many classifications of keywords already, and I don't want to introduce another one. I'd be inclined to make PUBLIC not a keyword at all, and instead have the production grantee -> ColId do this in its action: if (strcmp($1, "public") == 0) create PUBLIC PrivGrantee nodeelse create normal PrivGrantee node An objection to this is that you couldn't make a user named "public" (with the quotes), since PUBLIC and "public" would look the same to the action ... but that seems like a good restriction anyway. I'd be quite willing to tweak CREATE USER to forbid that name. I suppose it's a judgment call which is uglier. Thoughts? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: