Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Status of FDW pushdowns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23409.1385048774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Status of FDW pushdowns (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Re: Status of FDW pushdowns |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what >> data must be passed back because you would only pass back joined rows. > By 'insignificant' you mean 'necessary to do any non-trivial real > work'. Personally, I'd prefer it if FDW was extended to allow > arbitrary parameterized queries like every other database connectivity > API ever made ever. [ shrug... ] So use dblink. For better or worse, the FDW stuff is following the SQL standard's SQL/MED design, which does not do it like that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: