Re: pgsql: Clean up after TAP tests in oid2name and vacuumlo.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Clean up after TAP tests in oid2name and vacuumlo. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23385.1536082913@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Clean up after TAP tests in oid2name and vacuumlo. (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Clean up after TAP tests in oid2name and vacuumlo.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:52:07PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote: >> Oversights in commits 1aaf532de and bfea331a5. Unlike the case for >> traditional-style REGRESS tests, pgxs.mk doesn't have any builtin support >> for TAP tests, so it doesn't realize it should remove tmp_check/. >> Maybe we should build some actual pgxs infrastructure for TAP tests ... >> but for the moment, just remove explicitly. > Thanks for fixing this. I think that there is an argument for just > moving the cleanup of $(pg_regress_clean_files) in pgxs.mk out of the > REGRESS portion instead? I see little need for new infrastructure > here. It's really accidental that $(pg_regress_clean_files) happens to be a superset of what the TAP tests need to have cleaned; we shouldn't build that assumption in further. If we're gonna do anything here, I think it'd be better to invent some new symbol like HAVE_TAP_TESTS for calling Makefiles to define, then move all the support into pgxs.mk, including the prove_[install]check rules. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: