Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?
От | Kasia Tuszynska |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 232B5217AD58584C87019E8933556D110211D1AEDA@redmx2.esri.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected? (Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Szymon,
The PUBLIC role is a default, non login role, that is created with every postgres cluster/instance.
To my knowledge PUBLIC is a standard user in any rdbms. So, existence of public is not the issue here.
Sincerely,
Kasia
From: Szymon Guz [mailto:mabewlun@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:11 PM
To: Kasia Tuszynska
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?
2010/8/10 Kasia Tuszynska <ktuszynska@esri.com>
Hello Postgres Gurus,
Is it expected behavior for the has_table_privilege postgres function to not handle the user PUBLIC? Or should I submit a bug?
The has_table_privilege function does not handle PUBLIC – the following queries returns the error:
SELECT has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','SELECT') AS SELECT,
has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','INSERT') AS INSERT,
has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','DELETE') AS DELETE,
has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','UPDATE') AS UPDATE;
ERROR: role "PUBLIC" does not exist
SQL state: 42704
SELECT has_table_privilege ('public','bob.gdb.test1','SELECT') AS SELECT,
has_table_privilege ('public','bob.gdb.test1','INSERT') AS INSERT,
has_table_privilege ('public','bob.gdb.test1','DELETE') AS DELETE,
has_table_privilege ('public','bob.gdb.test1','UPDATE') AS UPDATE;
ERROR: role "public" does not exist
SQL state: 42704
Thank you,
Sincerley,
Kasia
Do you have any role that is named PUBLIC? I think that you don't have one. Check e.g. in the table pg_user.
regards
Szymon
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: