Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23225.961906544@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results! |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > Tamotsu Nakagawa has posted a fix for this to a local mail list in > Japan. Can someone comment on this? According to him, with the patch > now only the geometry test fails. > void > -abstime2tm(AbsoluteTime time, int *tzp, struct tm * tm, char *tzn) > +abstime2tm(AbsoluteTime _time, int *tzp, struct tm * tm, char *tzn) > { > + time_t time = (time_t) _time; > #ifdef USE_POSIX_TIME > struct tm *tx; Hmm, that makes all kinds of sense if time_t is not the same size as AbsoluteTime --- which wouldn't surprise me at all on a 64-bit system. time_t *ought* to be 64-bits on such a machine. The casts in that routine, tx = localtime((time_t *) &time); are obviously bogus if so. Can anyone with an Alpha comment? What surprises me more is the implication that this is the only place that makes such a bogus assumption about the size of time_t. I'd have guessed there are more places... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: