Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23171.1510637495@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Concretely, the attached patch fixes it for me. I've verified by >> examining the assembly code that this stops gcc from using movdqa or >> movaps in numeric.c, except for one place where it apparently can >> prove that it's dealing with a sufficiently-aligned local variable. > I am not seeing any difference in the assembly code generated by gcc > -S with and without your patch. Perhaps I am missing something? What > are you actually seeing? Hm, double-check your procedure. I get this: $ diff numeric.s.std numeric.s.patch 2746c2746 < movaps %xmm0, (%r14) --- > movups %xmm0, (%r14) 13948,13951c13948,13951 < movdqa 16(%rbp), %xmm0 < movaps %xmm0, 16(%rax) < movdqa 32(%rbp), %xmm0 < movaps %xmm0, 32(%rax) --- > movdqu 16(%rbp), %xmm0 > movups %xmm0, 16(%rax) > movdqu 32(%rbp), %xmm0 > movups %xmm0, 32(%rax) 14434,14435c14434,14435 < movdqa 16(%rbp), %xmm0 < movaps %xmm0, 16(%rax) --- > movdqu 16(%rbp), %xmm0 > movups %xmm0, 16(%rax) (If using -g, there are a bunch more diffs in the debug tables.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: