Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2316.1182146291@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Christopher Browne wrote: >> That won't help; that would introduce the "embarrassment" of having a >> known default password. > No it wouldn't unless the packagers set it up to do that. My point is > that when a packager (or source) runs initdb, it would prompt for the > postgres user password. Practically every existing packaging of PG tries to run initdb as a hidden, behind-the-scenes, definitely not-interactive procedure. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: