Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23141.1344837304@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> writes: > As for the value_to_json crashing, works for me: > postgres=# SELECT value_to_json(42); > value_to_json > --------------- > 42 > (1 row) Oh, right, because there actually is support for anyelement in the underlying C function. There is not in the quote_literal case. > Purely so I understand what the correct handling of the anyelement+text > overload would've been: In light of your comments on opr_sanity would > the right approach be to add a second C function like text_to_json that > only accepts 'text' to avoid confusing the sanity check? Actually, given the above, what did you need value_to_json(text) for at all? Wouldn't value_to_json(anyelement) have covered it? But yeah, the general approach to suppressing complaints from that opr_sanity test is to make more C entry points. The point of it, in some sense, is that if you want to make an assumption that two types are binary-equivalent then it's better to have that assumption in C code than embedded in the pg_proc entries. The cases that we let pass via the "expected" outputs are only ones where binary equivalence seems pretty well assured, like text vs varchar. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: