Re: fixing dllist?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fixing dllist? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23088.1174520232@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | fixing dllist? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Hi, > While coding the autovacuum stuff I noticed that the dllist.c doubly > linked list infrastructure is using malloc(). And the failure cases are > handled in #ifdef FRONTEND exit(1) #else elog(ERROR) #endif. > This seems a bit ugly, but more importantly, it doesn't let me free the > whole list by simply resetting a context. Would anybody be too upset if > I wholesaledly changed malloc() to palloc() and get rid of the #ifdef > FRONTEND? AFAICS, no frontend code in our tree uses it. IIRC, libpq once used it to manage the pending-notify list, but that was a long time ago. I have no objection to getting rid of the FRONTEND support. If you change to plain palloc you'll need to check that existing callers call it in a suitable context --- they may be assuming that the lists will be durable regardless of CurrentMemoryContext. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: