Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2306C399-4919-4694-9A0E-72CB5EE1D0B8@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > (a) Isn't that just holding open one connection, not the whole instance? Yes. > (b) Wouldn't finish()ing that connection cause the temp tables to be > dropped, negating the entire point of the test? The finish() would have to be the last line of the test. > TBH, I seriously doubt this test case is worth expending buildfarm > cycles on forevermore. I'm more than a bit tempted to just drop > it, rather than also expending developer time figuring out why it's > not as portable as it looks. I'm curious if the test is indicating something about the underlying test system. Only one other test in the tree uses background_psql(). I was hoping Andrew would have something to say about whether this is a bug with that function or justuser error on my part. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: