Re: CountDBSubscriptions check in dropdb
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CountDBSubscriptions check in dropdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23050.1573315694@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CountDBSubscriptions check in dropdb (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CountDBSubscriptions check in dropdb
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 3:58 PM Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 2019-11-08 14:38, Amit Kapila wrote: >>> I am planning to commit and backpatch this till PG10 where it was >>> introduced on Monday morning (IST). Pavel agreed that this is a good >>> change in the other thread where we need it [1]. It is not an urgent >>> thing, so I can wait if we think this is not a good time to commit >>> this. Let me know if anyone has objections? >> I think the change makes sense for master, but I don't think it should >> be backpatched. > Fair enough. Attached patch with a proposed commit message. I don't have an opinion on whether it's appropriate to back-patch this, but I do have an opinion that Monday morning is the worst possible schedule for committing such a thing. We are already past the point where we can expect to get reports from the slowest buildfarm critters (e.g. Valgrind builds) before Monday's back-branch wraps. Anything that is even slightly inessential should be postponed until after those releases are tagged. If it's HEAD-only, of course, it's business as usual. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: