Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23014.1220889431@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> So thinking we should test XLogArchiveCheckDone() for both >> stopxlogfilename and history file and then stat for the stop WAL file: > This seems better. Somehow I missed the 5-Apr patch that introduced this bogosity. Next time you make a fundamental change in the behavior of a function, how about updating its comment to match? After studying it for a minute, I think that XLogArchiveCheckDone no longer even has a clearly explainable purpose; it needs to be split into two functions with two different behaviors. I plan to revert XLogArchiveCheckDone to its previous behavior and introduce XLogArchiveIsBusy (flipping the sense of the result) to use in pg_stop_backup. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: