Re: [HACKERS] chomp PQerrorMessage() in backend uses
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] chomp PQerrorMessage() in backend uses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22dfa039-57f1-3687-79ed-869aafc00bab@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] chomp PQerrorMessage() in backend uses (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/8/17 11:00, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Here is a patch to systematically trim the trailing newlines off >> PQerrorMessage() results in backend uses (dblink, postgres_fdw, >> libpqwalreceiver). > > +1 committed >> I noticed that there are some inconsistent assumptions about whether >> PQerrorMessage() can ever return NULL. From the code, I think that >> should not be possible, but some code appears to be prepared for it. >> Other code is not. What is correct? > > libpq.sgml doesn't specify, so it's hard to argue that either position > is "correct". I don't mind resolving the ambiguity via a documentation > change though. I'd want to see it also cover other corner cases like > what if there hasn't been an error on the connection. I didn't dare to venture deeper into this right now. The committed change shouldn't gain or lose anything with respect to this question. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: