Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22977.1233088561@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd
Helmle
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 17:19:28 Tom Lane wrote: >> It's a potential security hole, since GRANT ALL on a view used to >> be de facto the same as GRANT SELECT, if you hadn't bothered to >> create any rules. > That is a good point. But the only clean solution would be to make views > never updatable by default, and invent a nonstandard syntax to make them so, > which seems very unattractive to me. A GUC variable as a transition measure > could work, though. Yeah, I tend to prefer the GUC approach over nonstandard syntax too. We'd need a GUC anyway to determine the default behavior if no nonstandard clause appeared; so we might as well just do that and not bother with the syntax options. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: