Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2284b71d-af55-2625-f8c2-cedf1f1a70ca@wi3ck.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba (was: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/21/21 12:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes: >> On 3/20/21 12:39 AM, Jan Wieck wrote: >>> On the way pg_upgrade also mangles the pg_database.datdba >>> (all databases are owned by postgres after an upgrade; will submit a >>> separate patch for that as I consider that a bug by itself). > >> Patch attached. > > Hmm, doesn't this lose all *other* database-level properties? > > I think maybe what we have here is a bug in pg_restore, its > --create switch ought to be trying to update the database's > ownership. Possibly. I didn't look into that route. Regards, Jan -- Jan Wieck Principle Database Engineer Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: