Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttmail.com> writes:
> Sorry for the delay, but the reply of Tom didn't reach me. I've modified
> the patch according to Tom's comments. I hope I am not too late.
Applied after considerable revision. This patch:
* introduced a memory stomp that was not there before (I strongly
recommend testing C code in an --enable-cassert build)
* added a user-visible feature without documenting it
* undid a conflicting patch that had been applied since your first version
* removed a number of useful comments from the code
I cleaned it up and applied anyway, but generally we expect a higher
quality standard for patches that are claimed to be ready to apply.
regards, tom lane