Re: Protocol Question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Protocol Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22826.1407769579@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Protocol Question (Thomas Heller <info@zilence.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Protocol Question
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Thomas Heller <info@zilence.net> writes: > The first 16 bits (well skip the first 40) in every DataRow ('D') packet > refer to the number of columns following. Is there any way that this number > is different from the number received in the RowDescription ('T')? A quick look into libpq says that it doesn't support them being different: /* Get the field count and make sure it's what we expect */ if (pqGetInt(&tupnfields, 2, conn)) { /* We shouldnot run out of data here, so complain */ errmsg = libpq_gettext("insufficient data in \"D\" message"); goto advance_and_error; } if (tupnfields != nfields) { errmsg = libpq_gettext("unexpected field count in \"D\" message"); goto advance_and_error; } > Currently I use an assert since I assume it always is the same, however I > only have tested with a very limited dataset so far. An assert seems overly optimistic. libpq has an explicit test with an error recovery path, you should too. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: