Re: Streaming Replication and archiving
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming Replication and archiving |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22807.1264029721@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming Replication and archiving (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming Replication and archiving
Re: Streaming Replication and archiving |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> writes: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> Sure, but if the archived WAL segments are NOT needed, how are they >> supposed to get deleted? It doesn't take long to run out of disk space >> if they're not being rotated. > From what I am seeing at the moment (8.5 devel from 2 days ago), the > archived segments are not deleted at all (I have several hundred now > after a number of pgbench runs over the last day or so). Huh? *Archived* segments aren't supposed to get deleted, at least not by any automatic Postgres action. It would be up to the DBA how long he wants to keep them around. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: