David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 11:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... We could keep it in that same "tablectx"
> I don't think you could do that and have your patch as SH_GROW() needs
> to pfree the old bucket array after rehashing, which bump won't like.
Ah, good point. Nevermind that idea then ...
regards, tom lane