Re: Postgres abort found in 9.3.11
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres abort found in 9.3.11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22750.1472737756@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres abort found in 9.3.11 ("K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <sandhya.k_s@nokia.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres abort found in 9.3.11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <sandhya.k_s@nokia.com> writes: > Our setup is a hot-standby architecture. This crash is occurring only on stand-by node. Postgres continues to run withoutany issues on active node. > Postmaster is waiting for a start and is throwing this message. > Aug 22 11:44:21.462555 info node-0 postgres[8222]: [1-2] HINT: Is another postmaster already running on port 5433? Ifnot, wait a few seconds and retry. > Aug 22 11:44:52.065760 crit node-1 postgres[8629]: [18-1] err-3: btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid: cannot operatewith inconsistent dataAug 22 11:44:52.065971 crit CFPU-1 postgres[8629]: [18-2] CONTEXT: xlog redo delete: index1663/16386/17378; iblk 1, heap 1663/16386/16518; Hmm, that HINT seems to be the tail end of a message indicating that the postmaster is refusing to start because of an existing postmaster. Why is that appearing? If you've got some script that's overeagerly launching and killing postmasters, maybe that's the ultimate cause of problems. The only method I've heard of for getting that get_latestRemovedXid error is to try to launch a standalone backend (postgres --single) in a standby server directory. We don't support that, cf https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/00F0B2CEF6D0CEF8A90119D4%40eje.credativ.lan BTW, I'm curious about the "err-3:" part. That would not be expected in any standard build of Postgres ... is this something custom modified? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: