Re: index on a box
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index on a box |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22738.993158503@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index on a box (Dustin Sallings <dustin+postgres@spy.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: index on a box
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dustin Sallings <dustin+postgres@spy.net> writes: > Around 11:08 on Jun 21, 2001, Tom Lane said: > # If you say "SET enable_seqscan TO off", and repeat the EXPLAIN, do you > # get an indexscan plan? > Seq Scan on tmp (cost=100000000.00..100002500.84 rows=30434 width=92) Drat. > I'm not sure what you just said. :) Never mind, it wouldn't work anyway. The problem is that "point @ box" isn't an rtree-indexable operation. You could use "box @ box" instead, where the lefthand box is a zero-area box with all corners at the point of interest. Crufty, but unless you want to go in and teach rtree about a new operator type... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: