Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22720.908752271@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | unique indexes and pqlib (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes: > 1) Is there any reason why I can't create a unique index on an int8? > It tells me this: > ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 20. int8 is new and not very thoroughly supported yet. Probably there just isn't support for making an index on it (Thomas?). > 2) Are there any more changes expected in the code for libpq? Ever? Yes. Before 6.4 release? Perhaps not, but I wouldn't swear to it. We are at a bug-fixes-only stage of the release cycle, but I do not promise there are no bugs in libpq. Why do you care, exactly? You shouldn't need to worry whether a library you use is changing internally, as long as the API is stable (and I certainly hope we do not find bugs that force an API change at this point...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: