Re: [GENERAL] How to create unique index on multiple columns wherethe combination doesn't matter?
От | Glen Huang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] How to create unique index on multiple columns wherethe combination doesn't matter? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22709A59-3CE7-40F5-8914-C85F2114E1E5@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] How to create unique index on multiple columns wherethe combination doesn't matter? (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Yes, the order doesn't matter, and this approach sounds like a good idea. I'll try it out, thanks.
On 23 Mar 2017, at 3:56 PM, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote:
On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:54, Glen Huang <hey.hgl@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
If I have a table like
CREATE TABLE relationship (
obj1 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
obj2 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
obj3 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
...
)
And I want to constrain that if 1,2,3 is already in the table, rows like 1,3,2 or 2,1,3 shouldn't be allowed.
Is there a general solution to this problem?
Does the order of the values of (obj1, obj2, obj3) in relationship matter? If not, you could swap them around on INSERT/UPDATE to be in sorted order. I'd probably go with a BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE trigger.
In addition, to prevent unsorted entry, on obj2 add CHECK (obj2 > obj1) and on obj3 add CHECK (obj3 > obj2).
Now you can create a normal PK or unique key on (obj1, obj2, obj3) as the order of their values is not variable anymore.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: