Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22674.1303140344@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1 (Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> writes: > On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote: >> I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago, >> I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized >> (official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client >> sent over. For instance, previous versions: > Am I right in thinking that would be that change committed on the 7th > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-04/msg00039.php) ? Yes, that one. > What concerns me > most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver has been > broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe > that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up? +1 for doing something along that line. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: