Re: Re: Adding foreign key constraint holds exclusive lock for too long (on production database)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Adding foreign key constraint holds exclusive lock for too long (on production database) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22670.1383229188@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Adding foreign key constraint holds exclusive lock for too long (on production database) (Ben Hoyt <benhoyt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Adding foreign key constraint holds exclusive lock
for too long (on production database)
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ben Hoyt <benhoyt@gmail.com> writes: >> It appears the possible explanations for Ben's problem are: >> 1. For some reason this query is a lot slower than the one he came up >> with; > Anyway, it's definitely #1 that's happening, as I build the > RI_Initial_Check() query by hand, and it takes just as long as the ADD > CONSTRAINT. Huh. Maybe an optimizer failing? Could we see the full text of both queries and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for them? > So I guess this is really a side effect of the quirky way we're > dumping and restoring only one schema, and dropping/re-adding > constraints on deployment because of this. Is this a really strange > thing to do -- deploying only one schema (the "static" data) and > dropping/re-adding constraints -- or are there better practices here? Doesn't seem unreasonable. One thought is that maybe you need to insert a manual ANALYZE after reloading the data? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: