Re: Questions regarding contrib/tsearch
От | Markus Wollny |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Questions regarding contrib/tsearch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2266D0630E43BB4290742247C8910575014CE331@dozer.computec.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Questions regarding contrib/tsearch ("Markus Wollny" <Markus.Wollny@computec.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi! > > If so, what can I do to have all of the database in memory? > > Buy enough RAM to hold it ;-) > > If the database is being accessed heavily then it will tend to remain > swapped in; you don't have to (and really can't) do anything to tweak > the kernel-level and Postgres-level algorithms that determine this. > What you want is to ensure there's enough RAM to hold not only all the > database hotspots, but also all the other programs and working data > that the server machine will be running. > > Check the actual size-on-disk of the tables and indexes you would like > to be resident. (Do a vacuum, then look at pg_class.relpages > for these > items. See > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/diskusage.html > for more info.) > > I would allow about 10MB of RAM per server process, plus a > healthy chunk > for the kernel and other programs. Is that 10MB per process on top of total database size + shared_buffers? In my case that would be roughly 1024MB database size + 2560 MB for processes (256 max.) + 256 MB for shared_buffers, I think. Or did I misunderstand you? Because in real life operation, RAM doesn't seem to be a problem, as there's hardly any swap-activity and most of the available RAM is used by system cache. Regards, Markus
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: