Why is index disregarded when querying a timestamp?

Hi!

I would like to know why this query here doesn't use the index on
ct_com_board_message....

analyze select        MESSAGE.BOARD_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.THREAD_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.MESSAGE_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.TITLE
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_LOGIN
as    LOGIN
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_STATUS
as    STATUS
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_RIGHTS
as    RIGHTS
            ,    to_char(MESSAGE.CREATED,'DD.MM.YY
hh24:mi')    as    DATUM
            ,    MESSAGE.COUNT_REPLY

            ,    '0'     as TFUID


    from        CT_COM_BOARD_MESSAGE    MESSAGE
    where        (0=0)
    and (MESSAGE.CREATED >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP-1)
                LIMIT 500

Limit  (cost=0.00..248.93 rows=500 width=134) (actual
time=311.82..19709.48 rows=500 loops=1)
  ->  Seq Scan on ct_com_board_message message  (cost=0.00..60122.07
rows=120761 width=134) (actual time=311.81..19707.81 rows=501 loops=1)
Total runtime: 19710.88 msec

whereas this one here does:

analyze select        MESSAGE.BOARD_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.THREAD_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.MESSAGE_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.TITLE
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_ID
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_LOGIN
as    LOGIN
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_STATUS
as    STATUS
            ,    MESSAGE.USER_RIGHTS
as    RIGHTS
            ,    to_char(MESSAGE.CREATED,'DD.MM.YY
hh24:mi')    as    DATUM
            ,    MESSAGE.COUNT_REPLY

            ,    '0'     as TFUID


    from        CT_COM_BOARD_MESSAGE    MESSAGE
    where        (0=0)
    order by message.created desc
                LIMIT 500

Limit  (cost=0.00..1630.99 rows=500 width=134) (actual time=0.81..35.28
rows=500 loops=1)
  ->  Index Scan Backward using idx_bm_created on ct_com_board_message
message  (cost=0.00..1181759.65 rows=362283 width=134) (actual
time=0.80..33.83 rows=501 loops=1)
Total runtime: 41.69 msec

It seems like if I compare timestamp in the query, it wouldn't use the
index - why is that so?

Regards,

Markus