Re: [PATCHES] BUG #3973: pg_dump using inherited tables do not always restore
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] BUG #3973: pg_dump using inherited tables do not always restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2266.1204587590@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #3973: pg_dump using inherited tables do not always restore ("Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] BUG #3973: pg_dump using inherited tables do not always restore
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Actually the bug is that ALTER TABLE allows you to do that. It should >> not be possible to drop an inherited constraint, but right now there's >> not enough information in the system catalogs to detect the situation. >> Fixing this has been on the TODO list for awhile: > Hrm how about something like the attached patch? It seems much more restrictive than necessary, plus it does nothing for the check-constraint case. My recollection of the previous discussion about how to fix this was that we needed to add an inhcount column to pg_constraint, and add entries for not-null constraints (at least inherited ones) to pg_constraint so that they'd be able to have inhcount fields. The latter would also allow us to attach names to not-null constraints, which I think is required by spec but we've never supported. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: