Re: GIN, pg_trgm and large table
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: GIN, pg_trgm and large table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22627.1520701227@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | GIN, pg_trgm and large table (Max Fomichev <max.fomitchev@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: GIN, pg_trgm and large table
|
| Список | pgsql-novice |
Max Fomichev <max.fomitchev@gmail.com> writes:
> I have the following table and index with about 15 billion records.
> ...
> PostgreSQL 9.5.12 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu
> 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609, 64-bit
> ...
> It there any way to improve GIN/pg_tgrm performance on a such large table?
There was some work done in 9.6 to improve pg_trgm's performance when
dealing with queries involving very common trigrams. So maybe an update
to 9.6 or v10 would help you.
I have a bad feeling though that 15 billion rows is too many for an index
based on trigrams to be really useful --- there are just not enough
distinct trigrams. It's too bad we don't have a more general N-gram
indexing facility.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: