Re: Vacuum Full
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum Full |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2259.1238633934@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum Full (Tino Schwarze <postgresql@tisc.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum Full
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Tino Schwarze <postgresql@tisc.de> writes: >> Maybe we should remove the code and make >> VACUUM FULL do the table-rewrite thing. > What do you mean with "the table-rewrite thing", exactly? Like CLUSTER, except not bothering to sort the rows: just seqscan the table, enter all live tuples into a new relation file, then rebuild the indexes from scratch. The only real disadvantages I can see for this implementation are that (1) it won't work on those system catalogs whose relfilenode can't be reassigned (pg_class and shared catalogs, at least). (2) it requires extra disk space during the rebuild; although the argument that VACUUM FULL works in-place is kinda shaky when you consider its effect on indexes. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: