Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22571.1250695764@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP) (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP)
Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > 2009/8/19 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> I don't believe there is any consensus for integrating dblink into core, >> and I for one will resist that strongly. Keep it in contrib. > if integration means, so I could to write query like > SELECT * FROM otherdatabase.schema.table .... > UPDATE otherdb.table SET ... > I am for integration. That is not what "integrating dblink" means --- what Itagaki-san is talking about is moving the dblink_xxx functions into core. What you are talking about is actual SQL/MED functionality, which we should indeed try to get into core someday. But dblink is a dead end as far as standards compliance goes. Between that and the potential security issues, we should not put it in core. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: