Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22565.1297189468@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > On Feb 8, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> No, this is not doable, or at least not in a way that provides any >> benefit over just dropping and reinstalling. The problem is that it >> is going to fall down all over the place if other objects are >> depending on objects provided by the extension. Like: >> >> CREATE VIEW v AS SELECT extensionfunc(1); > Ah, right, of course. I don't suppose CREATE OR REPLACE would work, either, in some cases at least? But figuring out just what commands to issue is pretty nearly AI-complete. The whole point of ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE is to have a human do that and then give you a script to run. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: