Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #14623: pg_trgm doesn't correctly process some regexp with negative lookahead
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #14623: pg_trgm doesn't correctly process some regexp with negative lookahead |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22558.1492145650@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [BUGS] Re: BUG #14623: pg_trgm doesn't correctly process some regexp withnegative lookahead (Corey Csuhta <its+postgres@csuhta.com>) |
| Ответы |
[BUGS] Re: BUG #14623: pg_trgm doesn't correctly process some regexp withnegative lookahead
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Corey Csuhta <its+postgres@csuhta.com> writes:
> I don’t know if this is related or a separate bug, but I am also having this problem with the `+` operator and
characterclasses. Very similar test case:
> CREATE TABLE foobar (x text);
> INSERT INTO foobar VALUES ('Trying +1/+1'),('Also doing +20/+20');
> CREATE EXTENSION pg_trgm;
> CREATE INDEX ON foobar USING gin (x gin_trgm_ops);
> SET enable_seqscan TO on;
> SELECT * FROM foobar WHERE x ~ '\+\d+\/\+\d+'; -- Returns both rows
> SET enable_seqscan TO off;
> SELECT * FROM foobar WHERE x ~ '\+\d+\/\+\d+'; -- Returns 0 rows
Hmm ... seems unrelated, since there's no lookahead constraint in this
example. Also, the patch I committed earlier today doesn't fix it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: