Re: damage control mode
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: damage control mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22530.1263258205@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: damage control mode (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: damage control mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Robert Treat wrote: >> There are three reasons I'd probably be comfortable with that; 1) the CF >> process means we've likely had more eyes on the code going in than in past >> releases. > The reality check is that was had commit-fests for 8.4 development and > 8.4.0 had more easily-identified bugs than most of our previous .0 > releases which didn't use commit-fests. They weren't "easily identified", or we'd have found them before 8.4.0 release. I think the notion that 8.4.0 was much worse than previous .0 releases is largely bogus, anyway; we've just forgotten all the bugs in older releases ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: