Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22529.1413735984@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Not sure how we get there without writing our own diff engine though :-(. (Note that after a bit of looking around, it seems like it might not be that hard to do something like this in Perl. Perl is already nearly-required for building from source, could we require it for running the regression tests? Though we'd also need you to install Algorithm::Diff or suchlike, which I think isn't in a basic Perl install.) > I had imagined that we wouldn't need this, but perhaps my workflow is just > different from yours. When I make changes which make tests fail for a valid > reason I'd use beyondcompare to cherrypick the actual back into the > expected, but I suppose others might just apply the diff into the > expected.... Umm, but then wouldn't you just copy the whole actual file > over to expected? That's what I usually do, except when dealing with the ones that are generated from output/ files. (Which are a PITA to update, and I guess files containing wildcard matches would be too.) > So why do we need diffs? Couldn't this matching tool > just report where the first non-matching line appeared in the file? Not too helpful for buildfarm reports. Nor for anyone else, really; you're just pushing the problem of identifying the important difference back onto the user. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: