Re: git: uh-oh
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: git: uh-oh |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22529.1282325313@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | git: uh-oh (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: git: uh-oh
Re: git: uh-oh |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> writes: > The history that cvs2svn is aiming to represent here is this: > 1) At the time of creation of the REL8_4_STABLE branch, plperl_opmask.pl > did *not* exist. > 2) Later, it was added to trunk. > 3) Then, someone retroactively added the branch tag to the file, marking > it as included in the REL8_4_STABLE branch. [This corresponds to the git > changeset that Robert is questioning] Uh, no. We have never "retroactively added" anything to any branch. I don't know enough about the innards of CVS to know what its internal representation of this sort of thing is, but all that actually happened here was a "cvs add" and a "cvs commit" in REL8_4_STABLE long after the branch occurred. We would like the git history to look like that too. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: