Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22510.1011070696@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Theory about XLogFlush startup failures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I know PageRepairFragmentation is real paranoid about this, because I >> made it so recently. I suppose it might be worth adding some more >> sanity checks to PageAddItem, maybe PageZero (is that ever called on a >> pre-existing page?), and PageIndexTupleDelete. Seems like that should >> about cover it --- noplace else inserts items on disk pages or >> reshuffles disk page contents, AFAIK. > What about PageGetItem ? It seems to be able to touch the item > via HeapTupleSatisfies etc. Hmm. Strictly speaking I think you are right, but I'm hesitant to add a bunch of new tests to PageGetItem --- that is much more of a hot spot than PageAddItem, and it'll cost us something in speed I fear. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: