Re: Performance problem with timestamps in result sets

On 3/8/06, mikael-aronsson <mikael-aronsson@telia.com> wrote:

> I do not think there is much more to do, the timestamp is just a 64 bit
> integer and you say an int takes 570ms/10920 calls and a timestamp takes
> 7130ms/8190 calls, this is about twice as much to get twice as much data.

No, thats about 16x slower (and most of the time is spent in the JDBC
driver, not on the wire).

Tom