Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ?
От | Thomas Dudziak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 224f323405080914194be16ac3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ? (Thomas Dudziak <tomdzk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ?
Re: Missing functionality in ResultSetMetaData ? |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 8/9/05, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote: > > I'm trying to extract the source tables from a result set for a > > arbitrary select query. For this I use the > > > > ResultSetMetaData.getTableName(int columnIndex) > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2005-01/msg00220.php > > Please see this message and the discussion referenced at the bottom of it > for why we do not support getTableName, but instead provide a pg specific > getBaseTableName method. Ok, thanks, I see. However, from what I read in the thread the question in the mail that you referenced, as to why PGResultSetMetadata does not extend ResultSetMetadata, and as a result the getTableName method is mapped onto getBaseTableName, is still valid IMO. Especially if the information seems to be readily available. Would you consider this change for an upcoming release ? regards, Tom
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: