Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22433.902097628@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? (Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug?
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl> writes: > On Sat, 1 Aug 1998, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's possible that there are still bogus length limits on username >> or password in some of the other PostgreSQL user interfaces besides >> psql/libpq. I will leave it to other folks to check that code. > I think the perl-module behaves the same, but I'm not totally sure about > it. I have a script where passing a 9 chars username to PQconnectdb() > fails to connect to a backend, while if I truncate the username to 8 > chars it works. Hmm. What pgsql version are you using? A quick glance at src/interfaces/perl5 doesn't show any dependencies on username or password length in it --- it's just a very simple wrapper for libpq. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: