Re: async notification patch for dblink
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: async notification patch for dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22404.1249395491@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: async notification patch for dblink (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: async notification patch for dblink
Re: async notification patch for dblink |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > Sure, I guess I ought to use the latest-and-greatest. Any other comments > before I commit? That "be_pid/be_pid" hack in the regression test is pretty ugly, and doesn't test anything very useful anyway seeing that it's integer division. Could you do something likebe_pid = pg_backend_pid() AS is_self_notify instead, to verify that it's a self-notify? (This is not quite right because you'd need to execute pg_backend_pid() at the remote end, but I'm not awake enough to remember the dblink syntax for that. Maybe it's too complex to be worth it, but I think demonstrating how to check for self-notify would be a useful bit of doco.) Otherwise it looks ok to me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: