Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22384.1021905117@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ... (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes: > [Moved to hackers} > On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 04:14:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> preproc.y:5330: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded >> >> This is with >> $ bison -V >> GNU Bison version 1.28 > I'm using bison 1.35, but get the same error. 1.35? Sounds like bison development has become active again. It was stuck at 1.28 for a *long* time. > It seems that there are only one or two projects ever to hit that limit. > But it appears to be a hardcoded limit inside bison. It seems I hit that > limit with the latest changes. > Right now I'm removing some simple rules to get under it again, but we > will certainly hit it again in the very near future. Yes. Maybe we should contact the Bison developers and lobby for an increase in the standard value. I don't mind saying "you must use Bison 1.36 or newer to rebuild the Postgres grammar" ... but having to say "you must use a nonstandardly patched Bison" would really suck :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: