Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 222e84b3f258d5487de5b5a0f1119e00b84071bc.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 13:40 +1100, Peter Smith wrote: > - how to set the replica identity. If a table without a replica identity is > + how to set the replica identity. If a table without a replica identity > + (or with replica identity behavior the same as <literal>NOTHING</literal>) is > added to a publication that replicates <command>UPDATE</command> > or <command>DELETE</command> operations then > subsequent <command>UPDATE</command> or <command>DELETE</command> I had the impression that the root of the confusion was the perceived difference between "REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING" and "no replica identity", and that change doesn't improve that. How about: If a table without a replica identity (explicitly set to <literal>NOTHING</literal>, or set to a primary key or index that doesn't exist) is added ... Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: