Re: Hypothetical suggestions for planner, indexing improvement
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hypothetical suggestions for planner, indexing improvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22292.1052195133@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Hypothetical suggestions for planner, indexing improvement (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hypothetical suggestions for planner, indexing improvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > THE IDEA: The planner should keep statistics on the correlation of foreign > keys and apply them to the expected row counts for EXISTS clause limitations, > and possibly for other query types as well. It's a thought. Keeping complete cross-column correlation stats (for every combination of columns in the DB) is obviously out of the question. If you're gonna do it you need a heuristic to tell you which combinations of columns are worth keeping track of --- and foreign-key relationships seem like a reasonable guide to the interesting combinations. I'm not sure about the long-term usefulness of optimizing EXISTS per se. Seems to me that a lot of the present uses of EXISTS are workarounds for Postgres' historic mistreatment of IN ... which we've attacked more directly for 7.4. But cross-column correlations are certainly useful for estimating join sizes in general. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: