Re: Incorrect Syntax in Function Syntax diagram
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrect Syntax in Function Syntax diagram |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2225085.1624462151@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incorrect Syntax in Function Syntax diagram ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrect Syntax in Function Syntax diagram
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 6:31 AM PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> > wrote: > Please separate the [ NOT ] LEAKPROOF from the OR list > I would agree, and would add that I wonder whether the syntax for the three > mutually exclusive options should be shown as such instead of having to > read that in the description notes. Does writing < | { IMMUTABLE | STABLE > | VOLATILE } > work? Yeah. The way it's written fails to show, except via formatting, that IMMUTABLE/STABLE/VOLATILE are mutually exclusive; and then somebody came along and destroyed the formatting. I agree both with adding braces and with putting LEAKPROOF on its own line. The latter is/should be only cosmetic; but the rest of the list has one line per independent option, and LEAKPROOF is surely independent of the volatility options. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: