Re: pg_dump bug fixing
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump bug fixing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22237.1090248271@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump bug fixing (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump bug fixing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > I think that we should treat the public schema specially :) We already are to some extent, since pg_dump will dump its comment and privileges, which it would not do for any other predefined object. I think this is actually an implementation artifact rather than something that was explicitly intended at the time, but since no one has complained about it, it's probably a good thing ;-) Also, if we're going to apply Fabien's proposed patch to alter the ownership of the public schema, that's still another way in which the public schema becomes less like a system-defined object ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: