Re: pgbench tests vs Windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench tests vs Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2223.1563923631@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgbench tests vs Windows (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench tests vs Windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > In commit ed8a7c6fcf9 we added some extra tests to pgbench, including > this snippet: > \setshell two\ > expr \ > 1 + :one > Unfortunately, this isn't portable, as I've just discovered at the cost > of quite a bit of time. In particular, you can't assume expr is present > and in the path on Windows. Ugh. > The Windows equivalent would be something like: > \setshell two\ > @set /a c = 1 + :one && echo %c% I wonder how universal that is, either. > I propose to prepare a patch along these lines. Alternatively we could > just drop it - I don't think the test matters all that hugely. I'd say try that, but if it doesn't work right away, just skip the test on Windows. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: