Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22214.1287960287@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for
is_trigger
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> writes: > I see that plperl uses a triple of (function oid, is_trigger flag, user > id) as a hash key for caching compiled functions. OTOH pltcl and plpgsql > both use (oid, trigger relation oid, user id). Is there any reason why > just using a bool as plperl does would be wrong? plpgsql needs to consider the trigger relation OID because datatypes of the trigger relation's columns will make their way into cached plans for the function. The same function, if applied as a trigger on two different rels, could therefore have different cached plans so it needs two separate cache entries. In PLs where this kind of dependency isn't possible, there's no need for separate function cache entries. I'm not certain that plperl is actually correct to do it that way, but that's the basic idea. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: